Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What in the hell is going on in NYC?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    What in the hell is going on in NYC?

    Children under the age of 12 will no longer face arrest and prosecution for virtually all crimes in New York under a bill signed into law late this week by Gov. Kathy Hochul.

    raises the lower age of the state’s jurisdiction for juvenile delinquency, a move that will prevent those under the age of 12 from arrest except in the case of a homicide.​





    #2
    ******ity

    The way to stop juvenile crimes to arrest them and punish them young

    1. Some get scared and learn their lessons

    2. The hardcore ones are taken off the streets

    3. You break up groups of youths engaged in crime

    4. The parents send bad kids off to another city/state/country

    1 - Juvie and youth camps are not fun. A lot of kids wouldnt like it in there and would prevent some from committing crimes to go back

    2 - bad kids will be bad kids and they progressively get worst and their crimes get worst. Lock some kid up when he does burglary and prevents him from advancing to robbery, lock some kid up for assault and prevents him from committing murder

    3 - crime is a group/participation activity, you break up groups by sending some away, you lower the crimes. Especially if the ones you lock up are the actual leaders/trouble makers.

    4 - parents sending their kids away is quite effective, if they were just committing crimes because of peer pressure or influence, you take that away. Also even if the kid does find trouble when he gets sent away, he's committing it in another jurisdiction and not yours.

    Not punishing criminals especially juveniles just encourages more crime. I dont understand why ppl don't understand this.

    Comment


      #3
      Dont you live in LA where you voted for DA Gascon doing the same thing..

      I hate this soft on crime stance.. both white collar and blue collar crimes should be punished severely..
      Im glad i live in texas..
      BostonGuy BostonGuy Zaroku Zaroku like this.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by B.UTLER View Post
        Dont you live in LA where you voted for DA Gascon doing the same thing..

        I hate this soft on crime stance.. both white collar and blue collar crimes should be punished severely..
        Im glad i live in texas..
        Me?

        I dont vote.

        Comment


          #5
          Sounds like a business opportunity. Any Oliver Twist fans here?
          Zaroku Zaroku likes this.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by War Room View Post





            Two of your video titles say 12 and up......so why the hell would you include that when this concerns children under 12?



            Anyway, my opinion is that this is great. For one, I'm not very worried about crime from 7-11 year olds less than murder. Eh. But more importantly, it's not like children will just be able to run amok. The idea is to provide social services to help them.

            You left out probably the most important part to all of this.

            Under the new law, local social services departments will be required to set up what’s known as a differential response program for those under the age of 12 who may have otherwise been charged as a juvenile delinquent.

            Those programs, which are subject to state review, are meant to connect children with proper mental-health care and other services rather than enter them into the juvenile justice system.

            Why would anyone have a problem with trying to help these very young children as opposed to putting them in the juvenile justice system?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
              ******ity

              The way to stop juvenile crimes to arrest them and punish them young

              1. Some get scared and learn their lessons

              2. The hardcore ones are taken off the streets

              3. You break up groups of youths engaged in crime

              4. The parents send bad kids off to another city/state/country

              1 - Juvie and youth camps are not fun. A lot of kids wouldnt like it in there and would prevent some from committing crimes to go back

              2 - bad kids will be bad kids and they progressively get worst and their crimes get worst. Lock some kid up when he does burglary and prevents him from advancing to robbery, lock some kid up for assault and prevents him from committing murder

              3 - crime is a group/participation activity, you break up groups by sending some away, you lower the crimes. Especially if the ones you lock up are the actual leaders/trouble makers.

              4 - parents sending their kids away is quite effective, if they were just committing crimes because of peer pressure or influence, you take that away. Also even if the kid does find trouble when he gets sent away, he's committing it in another jurisdiction and not yours.

              Not punishing criminals especially juveniles just encourages more crime. I dont understand why ppl don't understand this.
              I gotta disagree with this.

              Have you seen those juvie detention centers? They look more like they are prepping kids for prison life rather than prepping them to live as law abiding citizens.

              I just saw a documentary on one in ******ia. At the end it said 70% of the kids are rearrested within 3 years. That doesn't sound promising to me.

              Also, there are mostly poor kids caught up in this system. I don't think their parents can just afford to "send them away."


              This new approach in New York seems like a step in the right direction to me depending on how good the social services provided are.
              Rebelrbg Rebelrbg Zaroku Zaroku like this.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                I gotta disagree with this.

                Have you seen those juvie detention centers? They look more like they are prepping kids for prison life rather than prepping them to live as law abiding citizens.

                I just saw a documentary on one in ******ia. At the end it said 70% of the kids are rearrested within 3 years. That doesn't sound promising to me.

                Also, there are mostly poor kids caught up in this system. I don't think their parents can just afford to "send them away."


                This new approach in New York seems like a step in the right direction to me depending on how good the social services provided are.
                I've been to Juvie

                Sylmar juvenile hall

                Camp as well

                Camp challenger

                The reason kids from juvie are rearrested is because they're screw ups

                Same with adult prisoners

                It doesn't mean dont send them to juvie

                BTW you don't really get sent to juvenile hall straight away

                before i went to juvie, I was arrested several times

                I was always released to the custody of my parents when they go to the police station

                My lil brother beat up some guy, released

                He then stabbed a couple guys at burbank amc, released

                He then shot a couple guys, released

                Then when they filed attempted murder charges for the shooting, then they rearrested him and sent him to juvie to await trial
                Dr. Z Dr. Z likes this.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                  Two of your video titles say 12 and up......so why the hell would you include that when this concerns children under 12?



                  Anyway, my opinion is that this is great. For one, I'm not very worried about crime from 7-11 year olds less than murder. Eh. But more importantly, it's not like children will just be able to run amok. The idea is to provide social services to help them.

                  You left out probably the most important part to all of this.




                  Why would anyone have a problem with trying to help these very young children as opposed to putting them in the juvenile justice system?
                  The point of juvenile hall, jail, prison, camp is NOT to help ppl

                  It's punishment

                  Tired of ppl acting like the point of incarceration is to help or to rehabilitate

                  It's not

                  It's to lock guys up as punishment and so they dont commit more crimes
                  Idunnoshet Idunnoshet likes this.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by travestyny View Post

                    Two of your video titles say 12 and up......so why the hell would you include that when this concerns children under 12?



                    Anyway, my opinion is that this is great. For one, I'm not very worried about crime from 7-11 year olds less than murder. Eh. But more importantly, it's not like children will just be able to run amok. The idea is to provide social services to help them.

                    You left out probably the most important part to all of this.




                    Why would anyone have a problem with trying to help these very young children as opposed to putting them in the juvenile justice system?
                    If there is no arrest, how would they be charged as a delinquent? Maybe some letter comes in the mail.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP