Joe Louis or Sugar Ray Robinson...who was better at short range power punching?

[Boogie Nights]

Taking nothing away from Robinson whom I regard at the best fighter EVER regardless of weight; but Louis could KO a man with a punch travelling six inches.

Poet

and im sure you were there measuring his punches with a measuring tape

[TheGreatA]

Louis is the best at this but here are some examples of Robinson throwing short punches and KO'ing his opponents:


1:10, 1:40, 1:50, 2:45, 4:05 (that body punch is like RJJ-Virgil Hill).

[StarshipTrooper]

and im sure you were there measuring his punches with a measuring tape

And I'm sure you were there measuring Mike Tyson's d**k with a measuring tape.....and discoving it was only two inches long. Poor two inch Iron Prison *****.

Poet

[Boogie Nights]

And I'm sure you were there measuring Mike Tyson's d**k with a measuring tape.....and discoving it was only two inches long. Poor two inch Iron Prison *****.

Poet

lol just as i expected, dude you're way way too easy and predictible. i havent got into anything with you yet and you bring in tyson into discussion almost immediately with your first resposne

and whovever said anything about tyson? LMFAO anyone see tyson's name here?

seems like your're obsessed, or better yet upset with tyson on a personal level, since you cant stop talking about the man through every other post

the more i read your posts, and especially this one (thanks for confirmation), the more i tend to think that you're an ex-convict who shared a cell with mike back in 90s, we all get the idea what happened in that cell.

tell me how many stitches did it take for doctors to hold your ******* together again? looks like it's still loose, i see mike was more vicious with it than he was with spinks and holmes HAHAHA. poor poet it ain easy crawling on your 4's all day without any teeth huh

[Sweet Peacock]

Says the guy with Tyson in his avatar and who got banned defending Tyson.

[StarshipTrooper]

lol just as i expected, dude you're way way too easy and predictible. i havent got into anything with you yet and you bring in tyson into discussion almost immediately with your first resposne

and whovever said anything about tyson? LMFAO anyone see tyson's name here?

seems like your're obsessed, or better yet upset with tyson on a personal level, since you cant stop talking about the man through every other post

the more i read your posts, and especially this one (thanks for confirmation), the more i tend to think that you're an ex-convict who shared a cell with mike back in 90s, we all get the idea what happened in that cell.

tell me how many stitches did it take for doctors to hold your ******* together again? looks like it's still loose, i see mike was more vicious with it than he was with spinks and holmes HAHAHA. poor poet it ain easy crawling on your 4's all day without any teeth huh

Hmmmm. I think it has something to do with the fact that A) You have Michael Gerard Lector in your avatar; or B) You're the biggest Tyson nuthugger on this forum.

Dude. I've read plenty of your post and it ALWAYS somehow gets back to Tyson. It aint me that's obsessed it's YOU. So whenever I see one of your posts I'm not going to give you a chance to work the argument around back to Tyson: I'm going to peg you for the Tyson c**k sucker that you are.

Unlike Tyson I've never done time, but I'm sure if you asked Michael he'd tell you about the time he was traded for a pack of Newports. Hmmm, sounds like you and Mike have a LOT in common.....smoke if you got 'em

Poet

[Boogie Nights]

Hmmmm. I think it has something to do with the fact that A) You have Michael Gerard Lector in your avatar; or B) You're the biggest Tyson nuthugger on this forum.

Dude. I've read plenty of your post and it ALWAYS somehow gets back to Tyson. It aint me that's obsessed it's YOU. So whenever I see one of your posts I'm not going to give you a chance to work the argument around back to Tyson: I'm going to peg you for the Tyson c**k sucker that you are.

Unlike Tyson I've never done time, but I'm sure if you asked Michael he'd tell you about the time he was traded for a pack of Newports. Hmmm, sounds like you and Mike have a LOT in common.....smoke if you got 'em

Poet

LOL you got some nerve trying to pin it all on me. i didnt ask you to bring tyson into discussion. i also had sugar ray robinson, ali, sonny liston, ray leonard, and james toney among others in my avatar a while back, i dont see your arguement here. you telling me you gotta disrepsect another fighter because he's in my avatar...hehe....well go right ahead

here's some sad facts about you fella. you've been a member of other boxing sites posting blind hate about tyson, you gave mike remotely no chance at beating a vulnerable frazier, you said jack dempsey's defence was better than tysons' LMFAO, and you're also tried to pin lies on tyson to back up your arguement (tucker anyone, refresh your memory?). and just because i dont tolerate that bull****, i guess by your deluded admission that makes me a nuthugger huh

for someone who's in his 40s i gotta say, you're the most undeveloped and ******ed specimen for that age, and truly are a pathetic excuse for a poster, and your ignore list speaks volumes about people's opinion of you

one more thing, i got a treat for you



now you can finger yourself like you always do it when you watch it

[Boogie Nights]

Says the guy with Tyson in his avatar and who got banned defending Tyson.

LOL for someone who followed my posts im surprised that your small infertile brain hasnt figured out that it was not the reason i was banned in the first place

this is also coming from a guy who a short while ago had a red bar, (compliments of the love that so many users have for you here), and aslo the guy who picked steve forbes to beat oscar de la hoya

come back for more ownage, im enjoying this

[Sweet Peacock]

LOL for someone who followed my posts im surprised that your small infertile brain hasnt figured out that it was not the reason i was banned in the first place

this is also coming from a guy who a short while ago had a red bar, (compliments of the love that so many users have for you here), and aslo the guy who picked steve forbes to beat oscar de la hoya

come back for more ownage, im enjoying this

I was simply rooting for Forbes becuase he was the underdog, and i didn't pick him to win the fight. If you go over a poster's history, then go over it correctly. Also, i had that red bar becuase some dumbass by the name of msagrain gave me 5 in a row( when unlimited karma was here) becuase i reffered Calzaghe's resume to dirt. I had green k before and i have it again now. I have green k now because of the posts i have owning you.

[StarshipTrooper]

LOL you got some nerve trying to pin it all on me. i didnt ask you to bring tyson into discussion. i also had sugar ray robinson, ali, sonny liston, ray leonard, and james toney among others in my avatar a while back, i dont see your arguement here. you telling me you gotta disrepsect another fighter because he's in my avatar...hehe....well go right ahead

here's some sad facts about you fella. you've been a member of other boxing sites posting blind hate about tyson, you gave mike remotely no chance at beating a vulnerable frazier, you said jack dempsey's defence was better than tysons' LMFAO, and you're also tried to pin lies on tyson to back up your arguement (tucker anyone, refresh your memory?). and just because i dont tolerate that bull****, i guess by your deluded admission that makes me a nuthugger huh

for someone who's in his 40s i gotta say, you're the most undeveloped and ******ed specimen for that age, and truly are a pathetic excuse for a poster, and your ignore list speaks volumes about people's opinion of you

one more thing, i got a treat for you



now you can finger yourself like you always do it when you watch it

Personally I prefer the Holyfield fight over the Douglas fight; and no doubt you're fingering yourself to Tyson - Spinks, but that's neither here nor there. My ignore list is for people who are A) Complete idiots, B) *******s, or C) Both.

As for YOU, it's easy to pin the Tyson subject on you because it always comes back to Tyson in your posts. Period, end of story. You're obsessed with people who don't share your fawning worship Michael Gerard. As for me, my issue isn't with Tyson it's with nuthuggers: AKA fanboys, anus suckers, mind-numbed robots, true believers, and my favorite: KoolAid drinkers. Which one do you prefer because they all apply to you!

As for Tyson, I've watched the Tucker fight many times and no amount of Tyson worship is going to convince me that fight was a blow-out. You KoolAid drinkers chant that like a mantra (along with other BS myths like "Holyfield cheated" or "Tokyo never happend" or "If he had kept Rooney" ect). Giving him NO chance of beating Frazier? No. Picking Frazier over Tyson isn't the same as giving him no chance. The ONLY fighters I gave Tyson no chance of beating were Ali (too good and too fast), and Foreman and Liston (bad style matchup). As a rule I believe anyone on the ATG list or close to being on the ATG list is capable of beating anyone else on the list unless there is a style difference that makes it prohibitive (see Foreman - Tyson, Foreman - Frazier, ect). Now, giving them a chance doesn't make it probable. It means on any given night it COULD happen. If the two fighters fought ten times it's another story. Then you'll see the higher rated fighter pull ahead.

Unlike you, people don't see me worshiping any particular fighters in my posts. I have a more realistic view of boxing than that. For example, Floyd Patterson is one of my all-time favorite fighters.....but you'll never see me trying to make an ATG out of him. I have a realistic view of his abilities. You see, I watch boxing with my brain not my emotions.....unlike you who watches boxing with your d**k. I can separate things and enjoy watching particular fighters on one hand and analyze boxing with my brain on the other.....and never let the two mix.

So keep on showing yourself for what you are: A KoolAid drinking fan-boy who can't distinguish between fantasy and reality; who thinks not with his head but with his genitalia

Poet