Originally posted by billeau2
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Classical versus pre-Classical boxing and the "Gap"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostI can't speak directly to this fight, but these staged fights were often first presented to the public as the real thing (frauds,) and then when exposed would re-bill themselves as 'simulations.' (And they got away with multiple times; few people actually knew what a prize fight looked like.)
Comment
-
In my opinion I believe what we have is the evolution of two schools of thought and fans have a hard time understanding the old because it's largely a puncher's set of skills and punching as an art form is criminally underrated and explained.
Hell, boxing, in whys, whens, and whos, is largely unexplained.
Who beat who probably should come after who invented or innovated what but it doesn't and that's probably the biggest issue.
Comment
-
Johnson put the milker on a cruel rich kid once who knew savate and liked to bully people with it. The punk got in one good kick that would have finished most people, but Johnson was able to get a holt of his throat with a big milker while standing on one of the kid's feet. That kick hadn't felt very good, so Johnson began slapping the punk's face for him as he hung there turning purple with his tongue lolling out. Then he dropped him there on the floor like a puke rag and finished his pool game.
Comment
-
There are several accounts of English boxers fighting mixed matches against French savate practitioners.
With the boxers usually winning.
Comment
-
-
-
Comment