Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are people like Kristi Noem not worrried about what happens in a few years?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Are people like Kristi Noem not worrried about what happens in a few years?

    I watched Dan Goldman questioning her on Kilmar Garcia and she is just brushing him off because sure she is safe now since only the executive branch comands any actual force of law but publicly defying a supreme court order? Do they think this will go on forever? Its not, its all just going to flip back and forth until there is no U.S because people will blame their ****ty lives on government rather than be accountable and take some direct actionable steps to better their situation.

    Aren't Trump's appointees concerned about what happens after when they have publicly violated laws? Are they just playing the laugh now cry later game or do they really see no possibility of consequences ever?

    #2
    No, because bi den started the pardoning of his friends and family as policy. There is a question if he knew what he was doing. Enough humor.

    The Dem o carts dug in their heels investigating all of Trump's cabinet. What should they be concerned with? If they could bring up any legal dirt, there is none.

    ​You are a sharp poster. Think about it.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Dr Z View Post
      No, because bi den started the pardoning of his friends and family as policy. There is a question if he knew what he was doing. Enough humor.

      The Dem o carts dug in their heels investigating all of Trump's cabinet. What should they be concerned with? If they could bring up any legal dirt, there is none.

      ​You are a sharp poster. Think about it.
      You are either lying or really have no clue what is going on.

      Trump pardoned Charles kushner, Ivanka’s father in law, long before Joe got elected.

      Interesting 2nd paragraph. Does the same apply to Trump and claims
      of a stolen election? He couldn’t produce any factual evidence so that means there is none. Right?

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
        I watched Dan Goldman questioning her on Kilmar Garcia and she is just brushing him off because sure she is safe now since only the executive branch comands any actual force of law but publicly defying a supreme court order? Do they think this will go on forever? Its not, its all just going to flip back and forth until there is no U.S because people will blame their ****ty lives on government rather than be accountable and take some direct actionable steps to better their situation.

        Aren't Trump's appointees concerned about what happens after when they have publicly violated laws? Are they just playing the laugh now cry later game or do they really see no possibility of consequences ever?
        I don’t think they care because they will get cushy jobs or go back to the gerrymandered red states and be fine.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Dr Z View Post
          No, because bi den started the pardoning of his friends and family as policy. There is a question if he knew what he was doing. Enough humor.

          The Dem o carts dug in their heels investigating all of Trump's cabinet. What should they be concerned with? If they could bring up any legal dirt, there is none.

          ​You are a sharp poster. Think about it.
          Presidential pardons are a good point but it wouldn't apply to state crimes. The DA in states if a dem administration has their support would have all of the resources to look into anything they want digging up dirt.

          If it were me in a position I was appointed where the Prez is going to have my back no matter what I still wouldn't be too c0 cky, alot of changes could and are likely to happen. While for Trump, hes old, its the endgame so might as well go for broke now since time isn't on your side and you can stall if there is any trouble after his term is over.

          As of now Trump controls any of the enforcement so there is no mechanism to even look into it let alone have trials convict or punish anyone but it won't last forever. He kind of played his appointees if you think about it because he can remove them on a whim, if they did any dirt he can appoint someone else and go after them if they do anything he doesn't like.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post

            Presidential pardons are a good point but it wouldn't apply to state crimes. The DA in states if a dem administration has their support would have all of the resources to look into anything they want digging up dirt.

            If it were me in a position I was appointed where the Prez is going to have my back no matter what I still wouldn't be too c0 cky, alot of changes could and are likely to happen. While for Trump, hes old, its the endgame so might as well go for broke now since time isn't on your side and you can stall if there is any trouble after his term is over.

            As of now Trump controls any of the enforcement so there is no mechanism to even look into it let alone have trials convict or punish anyone but it won't last forever. He kind of played his appointees if you think about it because he can remove them on a whim, if they did any dirt he can appoint someone else and go after them if they do anything he doesn't like.




            No one has even accused a Trump cabinet person of wrongdoing, so there is no need for them to worry. The Trump team in his second term is an all star group!


            The secretary of state, the GA, and the VP are A plus.

            The press secretary is very good, and the treasury secretary is very good.​

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post

              You are either lying or really have no clue what is going on.

              Trump pardoned Charles kushner, Ivanka’s father in law, long before Joe got elected.

              Interesting 2nd paragraph. Does the same apply to Trump and claims
              of a stolen election? He couldn’t produce any factual evidence so that means there is none. Right?




              You are comparing his son in law to Bi den's son and major policy makers? You big Dumb.

              Bi den ( Hunter ) was a mess and funneled money from China and Ukraine IMO.

              The 2020 election is history with no voter ID required in many states, fraud was likey. No one can say who voted or they were registered as the person they represent. It is unproven either way. I think Bi den won it, but by how much?


              Millions of Dem or cratic votes vainhed in 2024. I would start there.

              In the meantime, voter id should be mandatory in federal elections. Agreeed? Well Dunn what do you think?

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Dr Z View Post

                You are comparing his son in law to Bi den's son and major policy makers? You big Dumb.

                Bi den ( Hunter ) was a mess and funneled money from China and Ukraine IMO.

                The 2020 election is history with no voter ID required in many states, fraud was likey. No one can say who voted or they were registered as the person they represent. It is unproven either way. I think Bi den won it, but by how much?

                Millions of Dem or cratic votes vainhed in 2024. I would start there.

                In the meantime, voter id should be mandatory in federal elections. Agreeed? Well Dunn what do you think?
                You said family members. Just showing you’re incorrect. Looks like you’re the dumb one yet again.

                That doesn’t work around Trump getting about $8 billion from China during his first term.

                Ahh so Trump couldn’t prove it but somehow it happened. Yes they can tell who voted- Trump’s own cybersecurity team said there was no fraud.

                It’s not unproven either way. Trump went to court and failed to produce any evidence.

                Despite His allegations not being proven in any court, you accept them as true.

                Can you at least be an adult and hold both to the same standard. Geez you’re embarrassing.

                Yes, less people came out to vote in 2024 than did 2020. Both sides voter turnout was reduced. Not that hard to figure out.

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP