Announcement
Dallas Jury Reaches Verdict In Amber Guyger Trial
-
Originally posted by Impeacher View Post
-
I weep for my people. The slave master's religion got us still in shackles
There was some subtle mammying going on in the court room in the Amber Guyger case today.
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed)
That’s why I really wanna see what this sentence is going to be
In the sentencing phase of the Amber Guyger trial today, to help show that Guyger isn’t the vile racist she has proven herself to be, the defense put up two Black character witnesses for Guyger:
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed)
A crackhead named LaWanda Clark...
And a Kenyan immigrant cop named Kathy Odhiambo
🤦🏿*♂️
You all want to know why racist killer Amber Guyger only got 10 years for murder and will most likely be out in 5 years? Because of all that Samboing and Mammying going on in the court. Here is Botham Jean's BROTHER hugging Amber Guyger.
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed)
🤦🏿*♂️
I have never seen a judge hugging a convicted cold blooded murderer. Black people in this courtroom was hugging, petting and comforting this racist killer Amber Guyger nonstop. Thats the justification that mostly white-identified jury needed to give her a slap on the wrist
— Tariq Nasheed 🇺🇸 (@tariqnasheed)
Comment
-
-
The conviction and sentence was just right imo.
Like I said in previous posts.
Manslaughter with heavy sentencing.
Or murder with light sentencing.
Murder + 10 yrs seems about right.
Remember guys it wasnt premeditated. She was ****** but there was a bad set of circumstances and bad luck involved too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View PostThe conviction and sentence was just right imo.
Like I said in previous posts.
Manslaughter with heavy sentencing.
Or murder with light sentencing.
Murder + 10 yrs seems about right.
Remember guys it wasnt premeditated. She was ****** but there was a bad set of circumstances and bad luck involved too.
The victim's brother being very forgiving was a big reason for the light sentencing in a murder conviction, imo.
Your last paragraph is spot on too. Despite some people trying to make it about race or about police brutality, it was simply a case of someone making some very ****** mistakes at the absolute worst time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostI don't have a problem with that verdict. A man is dead because of her carelessness and incompetence. She probably never should have been a cop to begin with.
Dumb b itch is lucky she’s. It in California. She would be looking at 15 to life for this second degree murder.
Her friend in the department needs to be axed to before he kills someone.
Dumb ***s.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostDoes 1st degree murder imply ‘intent? Did she go into the dude’s apartment with the intent to murder? I guess that’s what the jury thought
Murder has intent has an element (all crime does). Intent for murder is malice aforethought.
Malice aforethought can be express or implied.
Implied can be via reckless and wanton action that is dangerous to human life. (Example driving 100 mph in a busy street. If you run someone over malice is implied)
Generally first degree require premeditation.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View PostA bad set of circumstances.
If she got off on any other floor or walked to any other door nothing happens.
I read his door had a funky lock.
When she used her key, it opened his door somehow.
Any other door and she doesnt get in and she realizes her mistake and walks away.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1bad65 View PostI thought that too after the punishment phase.
The victim's brother being very forgiving was a big reason for the light sentencing in a murder conviction, imo.
Your last paragraph is spot on too. Despite some people trying to make it about race or about police brutality, it was simply a case of someone making some very ****** mistakes at the absolute worst time.
She would have realized her brain fart and just walked back to her apartment.
Sad set of circumstances.
He lost his life and she messed up hers because her dumbass got on the wrong floor.
I've read she parked on the wrong floor too? I dunno if true.
She parked on wrong floor so she automatically walked into the wrong floor?
If her car was parked in the wrong spot too, makes her excuse more believable.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BostonGuy View PostDoes 1st degree murder imply ‘intent’? Did she go into the dude’s apartment with the intent to murder? I guess that’s what the jury thought
VTCA Penal Code 19.02 provides for three criteria: 1. Intentionally or knowingly causes death, 2. Intends to cause serious injury in a clearly dangerous act, or 3. An act in commission of a felony or immediate flight. The statute continues to read that at the punishment phase, the defendant may raise the issue about adequate cause and immediate influence of sudden passion (heat of the moment). Successful assertion of such issue would lower the charge from a first degree felony to a second degree felony.
Comment
Comment