Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CA peeps, just a heads up

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    CA peeps, just a heads up

    Looks like the gas tax that was promised to not be used for anything else is being used for something else. How many times will they do this? When they raise the taxes they say "this time its for the roads" but each time they use it for something else. Just crazy.



    The law when its was passed last year.
    Your Gas Taxes at Work: Senate Bill 1 (SB 1)
    In April 2017 the California Legislature and the Governor approved Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017, a landmark transportation funding package focused on improving the local and state roadway systems. SB 1 established fuel taxes and vehicle fees which will generate new funding for roadways, including up to $1.5 billion per year allocated directly to counties and cities for local road maintenance, safety improvements and complete street improvements including facilities for bicycles and pedestrians. Sacramento County already received about $7.3 million of these funds in fiscal year 2017-18, and will receive another $21 million in fiscal year 2018-19. This amount will increase in future years and the County will receive an average of more than $24 million per year over the next 10 years. With this new funding SACDOT is able to continue critical services, including pothole filling and pavement maintenance work, that would be at risk of being reduced or even discontinued without this funding. The funding provided by SB 1 is also allowing SACDOT to make significant progress on reducing the County’s $700 million backlog of roadway maintenance and rehabilitation needs, and a $300 million backlog of pedestrian, bicycle and disability access improvements. These funds will go a long way in halting the continued deterioration of the County’s roadway system and bringing it up to an acceptable condition for all users.
    Last edited by man down; 10-05-2019, 01:46 PM.

    #2
    It’s going to improve transportation. It’s going to railways. That problem is what exactly?

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
      It’s going to improve transportation. It’s going to railways. That problem is what exactly?
      Did you read the bill that was passed? Did it say anything about the taxes being used for rail?

      What did they say they needed the tax for? Why did they need the new DMV fees and this gas tax for?


      Man you will defend anything from CA right or wrong.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by man down View Post
        Did you read the bill that was passed? Did it say anything about the taxes being used for rail?

        What did they say they needed the tax for? Why did they need the new DMV fees and this gas tax for?


        Man you will defend anything from CA right or wrong.
        no didn�t read the bill. Read the article you posted for the most part. Let me take a gander.

        And no I don�t defend everything Cali does. Don�t misinterpret my stance that Cali is the best state for meaning that I agree with everything Halle I gotta here. There are pros and cons to every situation. Rather be here than say Texas that�s for sure.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
          no didn�t read the bill. Read the article you posted for the most part. Let me take a gander.

          And no I don�t defend everything Cali does. Don�t misinterpret my stance that Cali is the best state for meaning that I agree with everything Halle I gotta here. There are pros and cons to every situation. Rather be here than say Texas that�s for sure.
          It says the funds can't be used for anything but the roads. The roadways were such a mess from last gas taxes being diverted that they had to put that in the bill.
          Gavin found a way around that.
          You're paying 1.50 to 2.00 per gallon more than say texas. Enjoy.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by man down View Post
            It says the funds can't be used for anything but the roads. The roadways were such a mess from last gas taxes being diverted that they had to put that in the bill.
            Gavin found a way around that.
            You're paying 1.50 to 2.00 per gallon more than say texas. Enjoy.
            You're upset CA is fixing it's railways? Lol. That's weird bro.

            Comment


              #7
              Read your entire post and the entire article. Only redirection is to rail road.

              Gotta link.

              I don’t buy much gas. My gas car get driven 1000 miles a year. And that’s an exaggeration. Probably haven’t bought gas since 2017. Roll electric. So I’m out the loop with these issues.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Boxingraya View Post
                You're upset CA is fixing it's railways? Lol. That's weird bro.
                Not at all, do you know how many times they've passed a gas tax only to use it for other things?

                What's wrong with getting funding for rail by itself? Why Rob the gas tax? Yeah because more gas tax is coming!
                Have you driven in the state?

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by Don Pichardo View Post
                  Read your entire post and the entire article. Only redirection is to rail road.

                  Gotta link.

                  I don�t buy much gas. My gas car get driven 1000 miles a year. And that�s an exaggeration. Probably haven�t bought gas since 2017. Roll electric. So I�m out the loop with these issues.
                  It's right there, last paragraph. That's the law "roadways" nothing about railways.
                  I'm sure you remember the fight over the law and the recall for it and the trick question. Yes meant no and no meant yes. Gotta love it.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by man down View Post
                    It's right there, last paragraph. That's the law "roadways" nothing about railways.
                    I'm sure you remember the fight over the law and the recall for it and the trick question. Yes meant no and no meant yes. Gotta love it.
                    Yea that what I said. Rail or high ways. It�s transportation related.

                    It�s not like they are building homes or paying for medical care with it.

                    Improve traffic. That�s all I care about. I gives a *** how it�s done.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP