Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Much Longer Before Main****** ********s Begin Calling To Rewrite First *********?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    I wouldn't be surprised to see free speech go away in the US. Team D is being short sighted with the hate speech bs. The reality is while words can make folks feel uncomfortable or offended our language is always adapting so those who wish to get some racist point across can always use some dog whistling term in that context with the same or a similar result. So unless you are making more & more terms "hate speech" as the language transforms it's a limp **** move or you just end up with a language of non-offensive grunts at a certain point.

    As far as that Goya guy goes he's a fooking dummy. As extreme as political bs is these days idk that you wanna go hyping someone from either party unless you wanna risk the other sides customers getting angry with you let alone when you are hyping one of the most agreed upon disliked Presidents since Nixon. Horrible move & I'd be surprised if he doesn't step down or get sh^tcanned sometime soon for it. So that dummy got what he was asking for in my estimation.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by JimRaynor View Post
      How do you or anyone else determines what is hate? Quite frankly what you just wrote I consider hate, therefore by your own standard you should get your ass whooped.
      calling a person racist slurrs, insulting them, belittling them, it is common sense man, you can ot say whatever you like and not get hit in your mouth. I dont know what that is so hard for you to understand..Be respectful or suffer the results

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
        freedom of speech is not the right to spew hate at others, if that was legal then the ass whooping that comes with it has to be legal
        Freedom of speech applies to all speech.

        You can't pick and choose what speech is okay or not.

        Then that's not freedom of speech.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by GrandpaBernard View Post
          I like this idea. Citizen A should have right to beat up Citizen B if B talks too much sh 1 t
          It seems people wanna be able to say whatever they want then play the victim role when the person you just spewed hate against kicks you ass..Hell thats Cause and effect

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
            calling a person racist slurrs, insulting them, belittling them, it is common sense man, you can ot say whatever you like and not get hit in your mouth. I dont know what that is so hard for you to understand..Be respectful or suffer the results
            You think there should be laws on insults?

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
              Freedom of speech applies to all speech.

              You can't pick and choose what speech is okay or not.

              Then that's not freedom of speech.
              well feel free to suffer the results, that is all I am saying..ya'll must live in some fairy tale world where you think you can say whatever you feel to people and nothing will happen to you

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
                freedom of speech is not the right to spew hate at others, if that was legal then the ass whooping that comes with it has to be legal
                Freedom of speech has less to do with regular folks with each other & more to do with regular folks saying what they wanna say without the government killing you.

                That said doe freedom of speech actually tends to work out just like you say it shouldn't oddly enough. A guy can say anything at anyone, outside of "fire" in a crowded theater, BUT you can also take it upon yourself to whip his ass for saying it if you see fit to do so. At that point you broke a law & might be getting a worse punishment by losing your physical freedom than you gave him is the issue with that.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
                  It seems people wanna be able to say whatever they want then play the victim role when the person you just spewed hate against kicks you ass..Hell thats Cause and effect
                  1. Words is not against the law

                  2. Assault is against the law

                  3. One is not a justification for the other.

                  4. Do you not find it weird that you are against someone saying something that might hurt someone's feelings.....

                  Yet advocate actually physically hurting them?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                    I wouldn't be surprised to see free speech go away in the US. Team D is being short sighted with the hate speech bs. The reality is while words can make folks feel uncomfortable or offended our language is always adapting so those who wish to get some racist point across can always use some dog whistling term in that context with the same or a similar result. So unless you are making more & more terms "hate speech" as the language transforms it's a limp **** move or you just end up with a language of non-offensive grunts at a certain point.

                    As far as that Goya guy goes he's a fooking dummy. As extreme as political bs is these days idk that you wanna go hyping someone from either party unless you wanna risk the other sides customers getting angry with you let alone when you are hyping one of the most agreed upon disliked Presidents since Nixon. Horrible move & I'd be surprised if he doesn't step down or get sh^tcanned sometime soon for it. So that dummy got what he was asking for in my estimation.
                    going on a crusade to boycott products because company praised a demo doesn’t sound like something “righties” do

                    Look at all the actors who are no experts in politics openly loving ********s. Do we see people responding by getting together and declaring they will no longer watch this dork’s movies

                    Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
                    It seems people wanna be able to say whatever they want then play the victim role when the person you just spewed hate against kicks you ass..Hell thats Cause and effect
                    Laws made with women in mind

                    Remember women don’t get punched in the mouth for talking too much nonsense

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Larry_Rushmore View Post
                      well feel free to suffer the results, that is all I am saying..ya'll must live in some fairy tale world where you think you can say whatever you feel to people and nothing will happen to you
                      You are confused.

                      No one is saying you can say anything without consequence.

                      First ********* is not about that.

                      First ********* is having the right to say anything.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP