Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

is Golovkin a top all time 15 great at middleweight?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by The D3vil View Post
    I think it's pretty obvious he is.

    I'd only definitively put

    Robinson
    Greb
    Monzon
    Hagler
    Lamotta
    Cerdan
    Ketchel
    Burley

    ahead of him.

    So, I'd say a top 10-15 all-time middleweight.

    I think this is the right way to do it, list the guys you have ahead of him and see where he lands.

    I don't think he touches the Mt Rushmore of the division:
    Monzon, Hagler, Greb, Robinson.

    I think there then comes a group of fighters that are probably ahead of him at Middle Weight:
    Ketchel, Steele, Cerdan, Hopkins, Burley, Flowers

    I think he can fit in with the next group: Walker, Tiger, Lamotta, Zale.

    Of course there are guys who may have been better but did most of their work elsewhere: RJJ, Toney, Fitzsimmons, Langford

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
      Hagler clearly lost to Monroe. No issues there. I did not see the Watts fight. The draw with Vito was close, I think Hagler edged it.

      My point is past middleweight greats retired young, avoiding losses and when they did lose or draw they were vs lesser men than Canelo, who GGG beat on fair scorecards. That point stands.

      GGG out landed Canelo in 10 of 12 rounds.
      I didn't highlight Monroe. The Watts and Antuofermo fights were clear Hagler wins to me and people who commented publicly on it. I personally didn't think the Antuofermo fight was close at all.


      I thought Golovkin edged Canelo in the first fight but clearly lost the second one in my opinion. Although it was close Canelo did far more damage and forced Golovkin to fight going back in much of the fight.
      Last edited by joseph5620; 12-22-2020, 08:39 PM.

      Comment


        #13
        top 25 in the gloved era in my opinion:
        fitzsimmons
        ketchel
        greb
        flowers
        walker
        freddie steele
        zale
        burley
        robinson
        cerdan
        lamotta
        fullmer
        tiger
        griffith
        benvenuti
        monzon
        hagler
        mccallum
        nunn
        toney
        jones
        mcclellan
        hopkins
        martinez
        golovkin

        sam langford could be in there if somebody wants to rank him as a middleweight.
        are there 15 better and greater fighters than golovkin on the list? i say no.

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Dr. Z View Post
          Hagler clearly lost to Monroe. No issues there. I did not see the Watts fight. The draw with Vito was close, I think Hagler edged it.

          My point is past middleweight greats retired young, avoiding losses and when they did lose or draw they were vs lesser men than Canelo, who GGG beat on fair scorecards. That point stands.

          GGG out landed Canelo in 10 of 12 rounds.
          - -Drunken punch monkey stats last refuge of a scoundrel...see Lampley...

          Comment


            #15
            The likes of Fullmer, Graziano and Zale would be true handfuls for GGG. Maybe he could take them, maybe not. Gene would probably badly disconcert him with his boiler room tactics. Amateurs are so polite, where most of GGG's ring career was spent. Gene's down jab may chop him to bits.

            Greb
            Hagler
            Robinson
            Monzon
            Fitz
            Langford
            Walker
            Ketchel
            Cerdan
            Zale
            Lamotta
            Turpin
            Graziano
            Fullmer
            Giardello
            Carter
            GGG?

            As you can see, GGG still has a bit to prove himself. A clear victory against Carnelo would lift him a few spots. Neither man has clearly beaten the other yet.
            Last edited by The Old LefHook; 12-23-2020, 01:21 AM.

            Comment


              #16
              Golovkin's defenses of the WBA "regular" title shouldn't count towards any record.

              Similar to how Canelo couldn't be considered a world champion at 168 for winning Rocky Fielding's "regular" title. It wasn't until this past weekend that Alvarez became a legit 4 division champion.

              Boxing historians should, and will, look at that.
              Last edited by ShoulderRoll; 12-23-2020, 02:04 AM.

              Comment


                #17
                If a man has the Eagle's belt for his division, that should be enough. I predict Suliaman will add a long overdue Eagle's belt to each division's beautiful collection. The Eagle eye of the public, by voting and a small fee, will determine and award this particular belt to whoever it believes is each division's top fighter. It cannot be lost in the ring.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                  Golovkin's defenses of the WBA "regular" title shouldn't count towards any record.

                  Similar to how Canelo couldn't be considered a world champion at 168 for winning Rocky Fielding's "regular" title. It wasn't until this past weekend that Alvarez became a legit 4 division champion.

                  Boxing historians should, and will, look at that.

                  The days of one champion are unfortunately long gone. Who is to say the WBA regular champion isn't better than the IBF champion? Strum would not fight Golovkin for his WBA title.

                  The fighters makes the belt, not the other way around in 2020.

                  Hopkins had 20 consecutive title defenses, which is impressive, but it wasn't lineal, nor was it in a row. I know some historians who say that and Monzon holds the real record with 14 because it's all lineal. The debate will never be solved. Golovkin has 21 title defenses, and most in the media say that is the record. If you have 14, 20 , or 21 title defenses, that's impressive. I'm not saying Golovkin's title defense were better than Monzon's. I view them close to even.

                  This isn't a GGG is better than Monzon or Hopkins thread, its a is he a top 15 all time middle weight who's still active.

                  Here a good article on the topic from Cliff Rold at Boxing Scene


                  http://jeetwin24.com/golovkin...medium=twitter

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
                    The likes of Fullmer, Graziano and Zale would be true handfuls for GGG. Maybe he could take them, maybe not. Gene would probably badly disconcert him with his boiler room tactics. Amateurs are so polite, where most of GGG's ring career was spent. Gene's down jab may chop him to bits.

                    Greb
                    Hagler
                    Robinson
                    Monzon
                    Fitz
                    Langford
                    Walker
                    Ketchel
                    Cerdan
                    Zale
                    Lamotta
                    Turpin
                    Graziano
                    Fullmer
                    Giardello
                    Carter
                    GGG?

                    As you can see, GGG still has a bit to prove himself. A clear victory against Carnelo would lift him a few spots. Neither man has clearly beaten the other yet.
                    Some fine names on that list. Prove himself?

                    Questions!

                    How many had more title defenses?

                    How many hit harder?

                    How many took a better punch?

                    How many lost to lesser fighters?

                    How many fought past the age of 35?

                    If you reply to each question is just a few names comprised of the best tin history, he belongs.

                    I think he's accomplished only losing once on crooked cards with his opponent caught using PED's.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
                      Golovkin's defenses of the WBA "regular" title shouldn't count towards any record.

                      Similar to how Canelo couldn't be considered a world champion at 168 for winning Rocky Fielding's "regular" title. It wasn't until this past weekend that Alvarez became a legit 4 division champion.

                      Boxing historians should, and will, look at that.
                      - -Better'n Poppy's first sham rule win and subsequent Midwestern ham&egger journeymen defenses.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP