Canelo’s Resume vs Pacquiao’s Resume

[Pac=Duran]

only thurman was a top guy but hey getting one top win when you are 40 is great. not everyone is hopkins

Pacs win over Thurman was way better than anything Hopkins did past 40. Winky Wright win was nice on paper I guess. Glad I never watched that fight tho haha

[hugh grant]

Pac s win over thurman is mind boggling.

[daggum]

PACs resume over 40 is better than Hopkins

definitely not. #1 tarver and #1 pascal vs #3 thurman. hopkins 5 top 10 wins vs pacs 1. other notable hopkins' wins are winky and pavlik vs broner for pac. i also had him beating calzaghe and drawing with taylor. pac only had 3 fights over 40 so its not really a fair comparison

[IronDanHamza]

Pacs win over Thurman was way better than anything Hopkins did past 40. Winky Wright win was nice on paper I guess. Glad I never watched that fight tho haha

No, it really isn't.

I strongly recommend you research more about this sport before posting on it.

The shit you come out with is often beyond moronic.

[daggum]

Pacs win over Thurman was way better than anything Hopkins did past 40. Winky Wright win was nice on paper I guess. Glad I never watched that fight tho haha

i dont agree but thats just me. i think tarver was way better and pascal around even. tarver beat the champ and all time great roy jones jr, and the #2, 3 and 4 guys all in 2+ years. thats super impressive. then he beat glen johnson who was also top 5 before losing to hopkins. 5 top 5 wins in a 3+ year period. thurman has 2 top 5 wins himself but no one like roy. pascal and thurman both have 4 top 10 wins but pascals win over dawson stands above any of thurmans imo.

[HeadShots]

Really? Are you sure about that?

You think beating Adrien Broner and Keith Thurman is a better resume than beating Eastman, Tarver, Winky Wright, Pavlik, Pascal, Cloud and Shumenov?

Yup. Broner is 3 division champ.

packik and shumenov r historical bums in comparison.


his win over Bradley is far superior to anything Hopkins has achieved. First ballot hofer


let’s add to that Thurman. You would have to be a pole smoking smooth brain to believe Hopkins is better.

[HeadShots]

i dont agree but thats just me. i think tarver was way better and pascal around even. tarver beat the champ and all time great roy jones jr, and the #2, 3 and 4 guys all in 2+ years. thats super impressive. then he beat glen johnson who was also top 5 before losing to hopkins. 5 top 5 wins in a 3+ year period. thurman has 2 top 5 wins himself but no one like roy. pascal and thurman both have 4 top 10 wins but pascals win over dawson stands above any of thurmans imo.

tarver is a lucky bum. He caught Roy off roids. That’s why he’s still not in the hof.



bradley is


pac >> Bradley and Thurman

hopkins entire career really

[IronDanHamza]

Yup. Broner is 3 division champ.

packik and shumenov r historical bums in comparison.


his win over Bradley is far superior to anything Hopkins has achieved. First ballot hofer


let’s add to that Thurman. You would have to be a pole smoking smooth brain to believe Hopkins is better.

Er, Pacquaio didn't fight Bradley when he was 40 or over.

These are their wins at 40 and above;

Pacquaio -

Broner
Thurman


Hopkins

Eastman
Tarver
Wright
Pavlik
Ornelas
Roy Jones 2
Pascal
Cloud
Murat
Shumenov


How could you possibly argue that Pacquaio's resume above is better than Hopkins?

[Beercules]

Pacquiao easily.

[Beercules]

Pac s win over thurman is mind boggling.

I was worried. Young strong champion against an aging Manny? That's a good win.