I mean Hearn isn't going to come out and say Davis deserves a 75-25 split. You start with saying 60/40 and then can end up negotiating a 65-35 type of split where it still ends up working well for Farmer.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Hearn: Davis A Bigger Name, Should Get 60-40 For Farmer Fight
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostIf you can't sell Farmer on DAZN, but Floyd can sell Tank on SHO/FOX, then do what's right, and let Farmer fight on SHO/FOX! Secondly, just be quiet and let Lou DiBella do the negotiating and the talking! Lastly, how much would Farmer get for fighting Jo Jo Diaz on DAZN? Will he get $2M? If not, why?
Oh, by the way, FightHype released a video on August 26th where Leo Santa Cruz said his next fight will be at 130 in November vs. TBA! Better move fast Eddie!
Comment
-
Lol, well Eddie why didn't just do that with Wilder? Just bid and whoever bids the highest gets the fight on their platform? You don't wanna do that when your fighter is the A side I see. You told Charlo to come to DAZN for fights, why didn't you wanna just put bids in then?
Comment
-
Originally posted by KTFOKING View PostI mean Hearn isn't going to come out and say Davis deserves a 75-25 split. You start with saying 60/40 and then can end up negotiating a 65-35 type of split where it still ends up working well for Farmer.
If DAZN are paying Farmer 3m for the fight then I don’t expect him to accept 2m to take the fight on SHO/Fox. And vice versa for Tank. Both fighters need to go where the money is.
Comment
-
Tank has a legit argument of more like 80/20no but they should make this fight but Farmer and Eddie need to understand that Tank don't need him at all
Also Leo Santa Cruz is a way bigger fight and would be a way better dance partner to do PPV with depending on how he looks at 130 his next fightLast edited by sicko; 08-27-2019, 09:42 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oldskoolg View PostExcellent advice on letting dibella do the talking.....the Americans really don’t care for Hearn and his approach.
Comment
-
-
Comment