
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adonis Stevenson runs to Showtime: Disgraceful!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Fooliun_Smaxon View PostPeople will say "He gettin paid doe", to which I say: F@ck yourselves fools! Are you guys fans of great boxing matches or of fighters' bank balances?
Stevenson, Mayweather, Andre Dirrell, Broner are giving us brothers a bad name. straight punk @ssed *****es, ducking fights all the time, taking the easy road and not fighting their main competitors.
Disgraceful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fooliun_Smaxon View PostPeople will say "He gettin paid doe", to which I say: F@ck yourselves fools! Are you guys fans of great boxing matches or of fighters' bank balances?
Stevenson, Mayweather, Andre Dirrell, Broner are giving us brothers a bad name. straight punk @ssed *****es, ducking fights all the time, taking the easy road and not fighting their main competitors.
Disgraceful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostI'd say to you when a networks business plan is what is causing you not to see the fights you want, isn't it proper to discuss business?
Yeah in cases like this we may need a bit of a discussion about it, but there are guys out there that get to immersed in it. You would never see me in an argument that is solely about boxers getting paid more than one another, network rivalries, PPV cuts or whatever. Or try to defend/slate a fighter based only on those factors. Never. I'm not here for that and it annoys me that some guys are.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by junior gong View PostThey are almost exclusively floydgimps. You can see them in this thread and all the others. They're a bunch of TMZ style gayboys who get more excited about fighters bank balances than they do about fighting(which they universally know *** all about). Spastics.
Comment
-
Originally posted by SthPaw View PostThis is different from the people out there that constantly go on about it though. You have a point, if business is stopping a fight from happening then by all means we can express our opinions on it. I understand that, but there are guys out there that put emphasis on it and make it the sole point of their argument a lot of the time, like who is getting paid more or who will draw the numbers in more or whatever.
Yeah in cases like this we may need a bit of a discussion about it, but there are guys out there that get to immersed in it. You would never see me in an argument that is solely about boxers getting paid more than one another, network rivalries, PPV cuts or whatever. Or try to defend/slate a fighter based only on those factors. Never. I'm not here for that and it annoys me that some guys are.
Boxing was alot better when the mafia ran it instead of Harvard grads and lawyers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Big Dunn View PostFair points. It's sad that the networks, promoters and fighters teams all put individual profit ahead of fans desires.
Boxing was alot better when the mafia ran it instead of Harvard grads and lawyers.
And as for the bold, I have heard a few people saying that, that gangsters and the mob ran the fights better than the bankers and lawyers do!
Comment
Comment